ISM Dhanbad Special Drive Faculty Jobs May-2011

Published by government jobs for governmentjobss.blogspot.com
Indian School of Mines (ISM)
Dhanbad- 826004
(An Autonomous Institution of Government of India funded by MHRD - Deemed University)

Speical Recruitment Drive for SC/ST/OBC and PH candidates

The Indian School of Mines University established in 1926, invites applications from Indian nationals for the posts of Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professors in the departments of Applied Chemistry/ Applied Geology/ Applied Geophysics/ Applied Maths/ Applied Physics/ Computer Sc. & Engg./ Electrical Engg./ Electronics Engineering/ Environmanetal Sc. & Engg./ Fuel & Mineral Engg./ Humanities & Social Sciences/ Management Studies/ Mechanical Engg./ Mechanical Engineering and Mining Machinery Engineering/ Mining Engg./ Petroleum Engg. :

• Professor : Pay Scale : PB-4 Rs. 37400-67000 AGP Rs. 10000, Qualification : PhD with first class or equivalent at the preceding degree in appropriate branch with a consistently good academic record. Minimum 10 years experience of which at least 4 years at the level of Associate Professor or equivalent.
• Associate Professor : Pay Scale : PB-4 Rs. 37400-67000 AGP Rs. 9000, Qualification : PhD with first class or equivalent at the preceding degree in appropriate branch with a consistently good academic record. Minimum 6 years experience of which at least 3 years at the level of Assistant Professor or equivalent.
• Assistant Professor : Pay Scale : Rs. 15600-39100 AGP Rs. 6000/-, Qualification : Ph.D. with first class or equivalent at the preceding degree in appropriate branch with a consistently good academic record.

Application Fee : Rs.100/- in the form of Demand Draft drawn in favour of Registrar, Indian School of Mines, payable at Dhanbad.

How to Apply : Application form may be downloaded from the institute’s website and submitted with necessary fees to the Assistant Registrar (Estt), ISM University, Dhanbad-826004  on or before 23/05/2011.


Please visit http://ismdhanbad.ac.in/noticeboard/recruitment.php to get detailed information along with Application Form.

Published by government jobs for governmentjobss.blogspot.com

(Click on the Labels below for more similar Jobs)

Biggest Recessionary Decline In States And Counties With Greatest Past Increases In Household Leverage

From "Household Leverage and the Recession" by Thomas Philippon, Stern School of Business, New York University and Virgiliu Midrigan, Department of Economics, New York University:

A salient feature of the recent U.S. recession is that output and employment have declined more in regions (states, counties) where household leverage had increased more during the credit boom. This pattern is difficult to explain with standard models of financing frictions. We propose a theory that can account for these cross-sectional facts. We study a cash-in-advance economy in which home equity borrowing, alongside public money, is used to conduct transactions. A decline in home equity borrowing tightens the cash-in-advance constraint, thus triggering a recession. We show that the evidence on house prices, leverage and employment across US regions identifies the key parameters of the model

.

How To Buy Gas For $0.25 Per Gallon

by: Chip Wood

Some neighbors and I were reminiscing recently about "the good old days" when the talk turned to how cheap things were back then. I immediately concurred. I told them of the very first credit card I got for one of the gas-station chains. Back then gasoline cost less than 25 cents a gallon.

And then I said something that stopped them cold: "Do you know that you can still buy gasoline for 25 cents a gallon?" They were all certain that there was a trick to my question … and there is.


My claim is absolutely, totally, 100% true – if you pay with a quarter that was minted prior to 1965.

We've written many times before about how much we like "junk silver" coins – the dimes, quarters, and half-dollars the U.S. Mint produced prior to 1965. These coins are 90% pure silver. A $1000 face value bag of them contains 712 ounces of the metal.


With silver now at an eye-popping $48 an ounce, one of those bags will cost you around $35,000. (If you bought one … or maybe several … back when they were a fraction of that amount, congratulations. Feels pretty good to own an investment that's gone up 160% in the past year, doesn't it?)

But the point of today's column isn't to applaud you if you already own plenty of silver; or to encourage you to get some, if you don't own enough. It's to make you realize how little prices have changed in the past 50 years – or even in the past 2,000 years. It's the value of our money that has changed.

In those wonderful days of yesteryear that I was talking about, a gallon of gas cost less than 25 cents. In real money – that is, silver – that same quarter is worth around $8.70 today – or enough to get you twogallons of gas at my local station.

Remember when a loaf of bread was ten cents? Well, a "junk silver" dime is worth about $3.50 today. That will get you the fancy hand-made loaf in the deli section of our grocery store. One of the mass-produced marvels with more air than nutrients will cost half that amount.

I'm told that in Roman times, the very best toga in the market place, along with a pair of sandals and a wreath for your head, would set you back one gold Caesar, or whatever coinage you happened to have. Today, that same ounce of gold will buy the best suit of clothes you can find at your local department store – along with a shirt, tie, and other accoutrements.

Well, actually, not that same ounce of gold. If you happen to have a 2,000-year-old-gold coin in your possession, please don't sell it for its bullion value. Even if it would be graded "very circulated" by a professional numismatist, it is probably worth much more than its bullion content.

Okay, okay. Some of you are getting a bit impatient. I can hear you muttering, "These stories are all very interesting, Chip. But what's the point? Get to the bottom line, would you?"

My point is simply this: The value of the goods you buy every day hasn't changed. A loaf of bread is still a loaf of bread. Ditto a quart of milk, a gallon of gasoline, or a suit of clothes.

The reason they cost 10 or 20 or 50 times more than they did isn't that they are worth more. It is that our measuring stick, the U.S. dollar, is worth so much less. Back in our grandparents' day, the dollar was not only backed by gold, but for most of this country's existence the U.S. government promised that it could be exchanged for gold at any bank in the federal system.

The Treasury also produced something called "silver certificates" which operated the same way, except they could be exchanged for silver. And our government promised to keep enough gold and silver in its reserves to honor all of those commitments.

Today, the U.S. dollar is an "I.O.U. nothing," as a friend of mine likes to put it. Oh, it says it is backed by "the full faith and credit of the United States."

But let me ask you: When you look at the disaster that Washington has made of the budget process and our economy, how much full faith and credit do you have in the people running the show today?

And how much "full faith and credit" do you have in the pieces of fiat currency called the U.S. dollar that they are manufacturing by the trillions?

I hope the answer to both of my rhetorical questions is "very little" and "not much." Or maybe "none."

source

How Goldman Sachs Created the Food Crisis

by: Frederick Kaufman


Don't blame American appetites, rising oil prices, or genetically modified crops for rising food prices. Wall Street's at fault for the spiraling cost of food.


Demand and supply certainly matter. But there's another reason why food across the world has become so expensive: Wall Street greed.


It took the brilliant minds of Goldman Sachs to realize the simple truth that nothing is more valuable than our daily bread. And where there's value, there's money to be made. In 1991, Goldman bankers, led by their prescient president Gary Cohn, came up with a new kind of investment product, a derivative that tracked 24 raw materials, from precious metals and energy to coffee, cocoa, cattle, corn, hogs, soy, and wheat. They weighted the investment value of each element, blended and commingled the parts into sums, then reduced what had been a complicated collection of real things into a mathematical formula that could be expressed as a single manifestation, to be known henceforth as the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI).


For just under a decade, the GSCI remained a relatively static investment vehicle, as bankers remained more interested in risk and collateralized debt than in anything that could be literally sowed or reaped. Then, in 1999, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission deregulated futures markets. All of a sudden, bankers could take as large a position in grains as they liked, an opportunity that had, since the Great Depression, only been available to those who actually had something to do with the production of our food.

Change was coming to the great grain exchanges of Chicago, Minneapolis, and Kansas City -- which for 150 years had helped to moderate the peaks and valleys of global food prices. Farming may seem bucolic, but it is an inherently volatile industry, subject to the vicissitudes of weather, disease, and disaster. The grain futures trading system pioneered after the American Civil War by the founders of Archer Daniels Midland, General Mills, and Pillsbury helped to establish America as a financial juggernaut to rival and eventually surpass Europe. The grain markets also insulated American farmers and millers from the inherent risks of their profession. The basic idea was the "forward contract," an agreement between sellers and buyers of wheat for a reasonable bushel price -- even before that bushel had been grown. Not only did a grain "future" help to keep the price of a loaf of bread at the bakery -- or later, the supermarket -- stable, but the market allowed farmers to hedge against lean times, and to invest in their farms and businesses. The result: Over the course of the 20th century, the real price of wheat decreased (despite a hiccup or two, particularly during the 1970s inflationary spiral), spurring the development of American agribusiness. After World War II, the United States was routinely producing a grain surplus, which became an essential element of its Cold War political, economic, and humanitarian strategies -- not to mention the fact that American grain fed millions of hungry people across the world.

Futures markets traditionally included two kinds of players. On one side were the farmers, the millers, and the warehousemen, market players who have a real, physical stake in wheat. This group not only includes corn growers in Iowa or wheat farmers in Nebraska, but major multinational corporations like Pizza Hut, Kraft, Nestlé, Sara Lee, Tyson Foods, and McDonald's -- whose New York Stock Exchange shares rise and fall on their ability to bring food to peoples' car windows, doorsteps, and supermarket shelves at competitive prices. These market participants are called "bona fide" hedgers, because they actually need to buy and sell cereals.

On the other side is the speculator. The speculator neither produces nor consumes corn or soy or wheat, and wouldn't have a place to put the 20 tons of cereal he might buy at any given moment if ever it were delivered. Speculators make money through traditional market behavior, the arbitrage of buying low and selling high. And the physical stakeholders in grain futures have as a general rule welcomed traditional speculators to their market, for their endless stream of buy and sell orders gives the market its liquidity and provides bona fide hedgers a way to manage risk by allowing them to sell and buy just as they pleased.

But Goldman's index perverted the symmetry of this system. The structure of the GSCI paid no heed to the centuries-old buy-sell/sell-buy patterns. This newfangled derivative product was "long only," which meant the product was constructed to buy commodities, and only buy. At the bottom of this "long-only" strategy lay an intent to transform an investment in commodities (previously the purview of specialists) into something that looked a great deal like an investment in a stock -- the kind of asset class wherein anyone could park their money and let it accrue for decades (along the lines of General Electric or Apple). Once the commodity market had been made to look more like the stock market, bankers could expect new influxes of ready cash. But the long-only strategy possessed a flaw, at least for those of us who eat. The GSCI did not include a mechanism to sell or "short" a commodity.

This imbalance undermined the innate structure of the commodities markets, requiring bankers to buy and keep buying -- no matter what the price. Every time the due date of a long-only commodity index futures contract neared, bankers were required to "roll" their multi-billion dollar backlog of buy orders over into the next futures contract, two or three months down the line. And since the deflationary impact of shorting a position simply wasn't part of the GSCI, professional grain traders could make a killing by anticipating the market fluctuations these "rolls" would inevitably cause. "I make a living off the dumb money," commodity trader Emil van Essen told Businessweek last year. Commodity traders employed by the banks that had created the commodity index funds in the first place rode the tides of profit.

Bankers recognized a good system when they saw it, and dozens of speculative non-physical hedgers followed Goldman's lead and joined the commodities index game, including Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Pimco, JP Morgan Chase, AIG, Bear Stearns, and Lehman Brothers, to name but a few purveyors of commodity index funds. The scene had been set for food inflation that would eventually catch unawares some of the largest milling, processing, and retailing corporations in the United States, and send shockwaves throughout the world.

The money tells the story. Since the bursting of the tech bubble in 2000, there has been a 50-fold increase in dollars invested in commodity index funds. To put the phenomenon in real terms: In 2003, the commodities futures market still totaled a sleepy $13 billion. But when the global financial crisis sent investors running scared in early 2008, and as dollars, pounds, and euros evaded investor confidence, commodities -- including food -- seemed like the last, best place for hedge, pension, and sovereign wealth funds to park their cash. "You had people who had no clue what commodities were all about suddenly buying commodities," an analyst from the United States Department of Agriculture told me. In the first 55 days of 2008, speculators poured $55 billion into commodity markets, and by July, $318 billion was roiling the markets. Food inflation has remained steady since.

The money flowed, and the bankers were ready with a sparkling new casino of food derivatives. Spearheaded by oil and gas prices (the dominant commodities of the index funds) the new investment products ignited the markets of all the other indexed commodities, which led to a problem familiar to those versed in the history of tulips, dot-coms, and cheap real estate: a food bubble. Hard red spring wheat, which usually trades in the $4 to $6 dollar range per 60-pound bushel, broke all previous records as the futures contract climbed into the teens and kept on going until it topped $25. And so, from 2005 to 2008, the worldwide price of food rose 80 percent -- and has kept rising. "It's unprecedented how much investment capital we've seen in commodity markets," Kendell Keith, president of the National Grain and Feed Association, told me. "There's no question there's been speculation." In a recently published briefing note, Olivier De Schutter, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, concluded that in 2008 "a significant portion of the price spike was due to the emergence of a speculative bubble."

What was happening to the grain markets was not the result of "speculation" in the traditional sense of buying low and selling high. Today, along with the cumulative index, the Standard & Poors GSCI provides 219 distinct index "tickers," so investors can boot up their Bloomberg system and bet on everything from palladium to soybean oil, biofuels to feeder cattle. But the boom in new speculative opportunities in global grain, edible oil, and livestock markets has created a vicious cycle. The more the price of food commodities increases, the more money pours into the sector, and the higher prices rise. Indeed, from 2003 to 2008, the volume of index fund speculation increased by 1,900 percent. "What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of participant in the commodities futures markets," hedge fund Michael Masters testified before Congress in the midst of the 2008 food crisis.

The result of Wall Street's venture into grain and feed and livestock has been a shock to the global food production and delivery system. Not only does the world's food supply have to contend with constricted supply and increased demand for real grain, but investment bankers have engineered an artificial upward pull on the price of grain futures. The result: Imaginary wheat dominates the price of real wheat, as speculators (traditionally one-fifth of the market) now outnumber bona-fide hedgers four-to-one.

Today, bankers and traders sit at the top of the food chain -- the carnivores of the system, devouring everyone and everything below. Near the bottom toils the farmer. For him, the rising price of grain should have been a windfall, but speculation has also created spikes in everything the farmer must buy to grow his grain -- from seed to fertilizer to diesel fuel. At the very bottom lies the consumer. The average American, who spends roughly 8 to 12 percent of her weekly paycheck on food, did not immediately feel the crunch of rising costs. But for the roughly 2-billion people across the world who spend more than 50 percent of their income on food, the effects have been staggering: 250 million people joined the ranks of the hungry in 2008, bringing the total of the world's "food insecure" to a peak of 1 billion -- a number never seen before.

What's the solution? The last time I visited the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, I asked a handful of wheat brokers what would happen if the U.S. government simply outlawed long-only trading in food commodities for investment banks. Their reaction: laughter. One phone call to a bona-fide hedger like Cargill or Archer Daniels Midland and one secret swap of assets, and a bank's stake in the futures market is indistinguishable from that of an international wheat buyer. What if the government outlawed all long-only derivative products, I asked? Once again, laughter. Problem solved with another phone call, this time to a trading office in London or Hong Kong; the new food derivative markets have reached supranational proportions, beyond the reach of sovereign law.

Volatility in the food markets has also trashed what might have been a great opportunity for global cooperation. The higher the cost of corn, soy, rice, and wheat, the more the grain producing-nations of the world should cooperate in order to ensure that panicked (and generally poorer) grain-importing nations do not spark ever more dramatic contagions of food inflation and political upheaval. Instead, nervous countries have responded instead with me-first policies, from export bans to grain hoarding to neo-mercantilist land grabs in Africa. And efforts by concerned activists or international agencies to curb grain speculation have gone nowhere. All the while, the index funds continue to prosper, the bankers pocket the profits, and the world's poor teeter on the brink of starvation.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/27/how_goldman_sachs_created_the_food_crisis

Instant Balanced Budget!

Today I've read (don't ask why) some interesting assertions that not passing an increase in the debt ceiling would actually be okay, and wouldn't really spell doom for the US's economy. The crux of the argument from the "don't-believe-the-lies-about-the-debt-ceiling" crowd seems to be that payments to all creditors could still be made (thus ensuring that the US avoids technical default) so long as government spending on goods and services is immediately cut by a sufficient amount to balance the budget. Since we can't get the politicians to agree, we let the debt ceiling force spending to be equal to revenues and presto, instant spending cuts and balanced budget!

Actually, yes, there's some sort of point there; I suppose it might be possible to continue to make interest payments on the debt even if the debt ceiling isn't raised, because revenue inflows are sufficient to cover those interest payments -- so long as you can instantly cut federal spending by $1.3 tr. annually.

Just for fun, let's imagine that we can simply stop sending out checks for $1.3 tr. worth of government purchases without actually getting into the situation where the US government isn't paying someone what they're legally owed. Let's imagine what that would do to the US economy.

A cut in spending translates into an initial fall in economic activity by an equal amount; cut $1.3 tr in government spending, cut economic output by $1.3 tr. (There's no crowding in effect when interest rates are at the zero lower bound, after all.) So overnight the US economy suddenly shrinks by about 10%. For reference, during the recent recession the US economy only shrank by 3%. Oh, and then over the coming months a couple of different multiplier effects would kick in, causing output to drop further.

If economic activity has fallen by 10% or more, it's reasonable to think that employment will fall by roughly the same amount. So we can expect about 10 million people to lose their jobs in very short order, bringing the unemployment rate to close to 20% of the US population. And then it would probably rise from there as the multiplier effects do their thing. For reference, during the recession the unemployment rate peaked at a lowly 10%.

Ah, interesting; we could all have the experience of living through the Great Depression, only this time it would have been caused intentionally...


UPDATE: text edited slightly for clarity.

Globally, Manufacturing's Share Of GDP Declining

From " 'Decline of Manufacturing' is Global Phenomenon: And Yet the World Is Much Better Off Because of It" by Mark Perry on his Carpe Diem blog:

The chart above shows manufacturing output as a share of GDP, for both the world and the U.S., using United Nations data for GDP and its components at current prices in U.S. dollars from 1970 to 2009.

The complete post is available here.

Videos Of Kate Middleton's Wedding Dress And The Royal Couple's Vows

The Royal wedding dress worn by Kate Middleton:




The Royal couple's wedding vows:

Possibility Of An Unfriendly Takeover Tender Offer For NYSE By Nasdaq-ICE

From Bloomberg, "Nasdaq, ICE Are Said to Consider Tender Offer for NYSE" by Nina Mehta:

Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. (NDAQ) and IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (ICE) may take their unsolicited takeover offer for NYSE Euronext directly to shareholders, bypassing board members who twice rejected their bid, according to a person familiar with the matter.

An appealing tender offer price may move enough NYSE shares into arbitrageurs' hands to give Nasdaq a realistic chance to acquire NYSE.

The Occidental Obama

article by: Lee S. Gliddon Jr.


As the Obama meandering trail of life becomes the interstate highway of courtroom trials for our beloved leader, Birdie Obama, it perhaps is time to weave the fabric of Barack’s Muslim, Kenyan, Indonesian, Hawaiian serape to explain just what he is hiding by hiring his platoon of lawyers.

What is taking place is indeed conspiracy as in the sense a violation of the RICO Act. This involves the state of Hawaii and Occidental College, if not Columbia of New York and Harvard.


What requires explanation in this is a generation of crime in supplanting the United States for money. It is as simple as that in local government policy being fed huge sums of money at the behest of Ford Foundation incorporating globalist policy into American culture.

Barack Obama is simply the tip of this iceberg which he desperately must conceal, along with all these other benefactors or beyond embarrassment, people will go to prison.

The first task in need of explanation is why would Hawaii aid a known illegal of British birth in illegally obtaining a fake birth certificate?

The answer is in 1961 the American public had not yet been herded by Teddy Kennedy and socialists into providing welfare benefits to illegals. Hawaii had a large population of illegals who were slave labor, but were a huge burden to the system in poverty and crime.

The Hawaiian answer, as it was a Democratic state and still is was to start registering all those foreign kids by the thousands. The purpose being to tap into all those federal hundreds of millions then which would profit the state.

See all of those poverty programs flowed funds into the pockets of the retailers as the golden goose pipeline. If one makes citizens out of illegals, then Hawaii converts a debt into their asset in obtaining more funds and growing the socialist system which empowers Democratic liberals.

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of Barack Obama’s registered in Hawaii. Do you think even a Republican governor sitting on this explosive mess wants any of this coming out?

An entire state sold out the United States for filthy lucre, because they were importing Asian slave labor. That does not make a great headline, nor, did they probably ever expect a money train welfare illegal would somehow get himself installed as President which would expose the entire Hawaiian fraud, and you know very well that all of those records would have to be gone through and verified so an Obama repeat would not occur, in all 50 states.

Talk about a nightmare huh? The nightmare would be the removal of Obama under Quo Warrantus which is being attempted now and 49 other states suing Hawaii for the money it would cost to check all of their records over the Hawaiian fraud.

Hawaii has always been a corrupt enclave like Rhode Island. Hawaii was the conduit in the Clinton years to get Chinese communists a stake in the United States Stock Market, to which Hawaii had the first meltdown in this scheme in costing their investors a fortune and ruining their banks.

That is why Hawaii is in collusion with Barack Obama. There were involved in massive welfare fraud and do not want this coming out.

With this kind of background, in families being “informed” of the opportunities involved in engaging in illegal citizenship, one Stanley Ann Dunham, hauled her little African eastern boy to Indonesia, until the jungle fever wore off, and then dumped him into the Hawaiian system again where Grandma Dunham was stuck with the kid.

Grandma Madelyn Dunham did earn some money in BankHo, her bank in Hawaii, but I suspect that the prestigious school Barry got into, was the same game that brought Barack Sr. to America on a free educational route.

Barry Obama Soetero was tapping into the welfare system of Hawaii, and in knowing what twisters the Dunhams were, this takes us into Occidental College.

Amusingly Occidental College, basically means round eye college as occidentals are of the European origin who reside in North and South America. The place Obama chose to be dumped into by the Dunhams, was like many of the colleges in that 1979 period in tapping into government resources of free money to “educate” foreigners.

One has to understand colleges in America do not operate to educate children. They are conduits of establishing globalist brainwashing into children and as dry cleaning of billions of dollars in funds in “research”.

For example Wisconsin has a female professor who took huge amounts of cash for global warming, and one of her subjects was studying how the Great Lakes absorbing carbon gases affected warming. One might as well studied your bathtub water for the effect as if you look at a map you see the Great Lakes are dots compared to the oceans.

There are numerous studies linked to this gravy train of funds which flow into colleges and back into corporations whose equipment and services are purchased.

It is the Warren Buffett money flow into Walmart for his Chinese investments. except in this case it is college money laundering.

So the Dunhams were adept at illegal activities in scamming the American system, so it is a conclusion by what Barack Obama has been up to with his platoon of lawyers that he is covering something up.

Remember it is public information that Barry Obama upon going into college became Barack Hussein Obama. Liberals have explained this away as, “Barack was more intellectual sounding”. Not a chance, because what was going on is this:

A college career recruiter shows up and says, “Barry come to Occidental as you will have fun”.

Barry goes home and tells Gram Dunham he wants to go have fun. Either money is tight or the Dunhams are basic welfare swindlers and being cheap as they are, Gramma and Mama put their heads together and say, “Hey, we can get a free education if we dust off Barack Sr. being a British subject.”
They tell Occidental that and Occidental says, “Great, but we need documentation”.

“Crapper in the wrapper, “Stan and Mad say as all they got is a bogus Hawaiian birth certificate making him Americans.

Then Stan and Mad remember that Barry was adopted by Indonesian Papa Soetero. They tell Occidental this and provide Barry Soetero school records from Indonesia and Occidental says, “Eureka, you have struck it rich pilgrims. There is golden grants in them Indonesian hills!”

So Birdie becomes Barack and Occidental gets a big ole Obama grant to go with all their other foreign student federal grants they have been milking the system for at the behest of the globalists.

The problem now is, Occidental never figured their scammer would produce a person in the White House. See this system was designed to Americanize 3rd worlders with globalist nonsense and then bury them back into Indonesia, Russia and Kenya to ruin those peoples lives.

Occidental now has a huge problem as it engaged in federal student loan fraud which gave them like many of these globalist programs huge bankrolls to profit off of in exchange for Rothschild plans.

None of these geniuses ever suspected that a scammer scamming the system would have a parent who would eventually tap into the Ford Foundation money and fellow traveler contacts which would start opening doors, including psychiatric research doors in reprogramming a Birdie dope head in Columbia to become Barack the communist organizer of Chicago.

Stanley Ann Dunham got greedy in out of necessity. She tossed Barry away in abandoning him in trying to get rid of her reminder of jungle fever, but still had this reminder turning into an eyesore dope head. She took this looser, put him into a program to “fix him”, laying Bill Ayers mindset onto him, all for the purpose of making her sexual mistake into something which would soothe her troubled breast.

The problem is Stanley looks like she embezzled funds from Ford to give Birdie a jump start at life in making her mistake into her glory. As this blog noted, Birdie was only supposed to be the new Jesse Jackson in bringing in the black vote at the beginning.

He though was transformed by his programming to take the lead of self fulfillment in being President when Hillary was forced to take a dive.

Not for one moment though have the Rothschilds nor Rockefellers not known Barry Soetero is dripping wet with fraud. Bill Clinton constantly hinting at “Constitutional qualifications” means in the boardrooms where these people meet, they have discussed it, have the paper trail and have Obama by his testicles that Jesse Jackson wanted to cut off.

Jackson pronounced the race was now complete and there was no more need for “black affirmation” as the race has now reached the mark.

The globalists know all of this and are shedding the black vote for the Hispanic vote with Obama as their Judas goat in betraying blacks. The globalists know full well how precarious of position Obama is in. They know if this comes out the country will be in chaos and they know if Obama stays in office the continued economic attack on America will simply provide their conduit in establishing their global order.
These financiers win no matter what as they have set this out to play out this way.

Strangely Orly Taitz, the lawyer who has the best option to bring all of this out and shine a light on the sordid money fraud situation betraying the United States is a factor the globalists hope for as the more turmoil created the better it is for the global order.

At the very least in this, Barack Obama is guilty of federal money fraud. As Tom Daschle and Tim Geithner just said “Ooops sorry” and paid it back, it could end there for Obama in the foreign student loans IF he had not shown a pattern for the period from 1971 to at least 1982 in passing himself off as Barry Soetero, resident of Indonesia as an adopted son from British Kenya all to tap into the American money supply.
A normal moral person would never have gotten themselves into this mess, but Obama because of his programming and what that did to his phobic compulsion disorder has been ploughing on in this using the shield of the patricians who created him as they are powerful and connected people.

Occidental College opens up the door to Barack Obama declaring in writing he is not American, but foreign. This progresses to Columbia in this fraud as Birdie at home with the racist base elements as he dope slides along, concludes he is owed a little summer vacation with his Pakistani buddies.

Always the Dunham corner cutter, he goes into Pakistan once again on an Indonesian passport which signifies again Barack Obama is Indonesian as Americans could not get into Pakistan.

Obama would have probably gotten away with the money fraud, if he had not been too cheap and decided he just had to flip the bird to the American system and get into Pakistan. Those records prove he is an affirmed triple citizen of British Kenya, Indonesia and America, if not Canada registration too.
Any part of which disqualifies him for President of the United States.

Birdie Obama is like the crook who steals a million dollars, but has to go back and pick up the bank President’s pen in greed and that is the 20 dollar item that gets him busted.

There are federal records for these Obama applications for funding in the Department of Education. As of Barack Obama attempting to further smear George W. Bush in releasing Bush documents, to take the heat off of Birdie, the Dunham, Obama, Soetero education files are now open to the Freedom of Information act as all papers associated with a President are, as Barack Obama made this a presidential issue when he hired attorneys to cover up what was being hidden at Occidental College.

This is a matter for the Justice Department as it is money fraud of college funds and it is a matter for the Republican minority in Congress to demand and hold hearings investigating this.

Those records all exist and if someone destroyed them and they are missing, that is a federal crime of which Barack Obama is benefited by, as in he is then a guilty co-conspirator in another felony. If you get money from someone illegally, and someone else burns the papers protecting you, you are just as guilty as the person who lit the match.

That is how all of this ties together from Hawaiian welfare fraud, Occidental College student finance fraud and Barack Obama currency fraud defrauding the American public of funds and places of education for it’s own citizens.

This is really a large issue of global scale and Barack Obama is the tip of the felony iceberg. Someone is going to come forward with the papers which will light this up as it is in the globalists interests to do this. It will though come out as the scenario of operation is exposed here in tying it all together and as more people figure it out, then the conversation becomes, “I’m not following that crook in the White House”, and Barack Obama occupying that House or in exile does not matter as he will cease to be President as America and then Congress ignores him.

Russia has figured this out people, President Medvedev brushed off Obama’s overture on European missiles linked to help in Iran. They know Obama is finished and are going to Jimmy Carter fillet him for concessions as Obama needs them and they do not need Obama.

A simple alert for people who have not noticed this Nixonian Clintonesque Obama era, the Russians and Chinese have just declared the United States under Obama as unnecessary.

Richard Holbrooke pissed on the President of Iran, well President Medvedev just pissed on Barack Obama and America today.

You people at AOL, Politico and other mania outlets attacking “birthers” or this site, you had better do a reality check as your Obama, on an issue you claim does not exist, just proved it matters to the people with nuclear missiles aimed at America.

You Obamamaniacs did this and no matter how deluded you are into thinking he is your Mahdi, the real world has just dismissed him as already not being leader of the United States.

The time will come when the American majority ignores him. Then what will Obamamaniacs do as you have growing numbers of military already refusing to follow orders from Obama without those papers you claim do not matter?

The Russians just slapped the person in the Oval Office across the face today as Obama gave them all they demanded. Every terrorist, every world leader just witnessed and noted what happened.

They are coming now for America and this all traces back to the Occidental Obama.

Unemployment Movement in 'Right Direction'

Jobs

What is Bonded Labour?

Bonded labour - or debt bondage - is probably the least known form of slavery today, and yet it is the most widely used method of enslaving people. A person becomes a bonded labourer when their labour is demanded as a means of repayment for a loan. The person is then tricked or trapped into working for very little or no pay, often for seven days a week. The value of their work is invariably greater than the original sum of money borrowed.

Who are the bonded labourers?
Entire families treated like cattle on farms in India, Pakistan and Nepal and the 7.15 to Waterloo; migrant agricultural workers forced to remain on ranches in Brazil; and the organised export of women into domestic and sexual slavery in Europe. Huge promises made by Politicians ensure that most of the labour of the worker goes straight to the Government and the remainder must be used by the worker for housing and food.Bonds (future tax revenues of the workers) are sold by governments to each other, enslaving even the unborn into the system. The average child in Britain is now born "owing" £90,000 to the plantation owner.

Bonded labour is expanding due to poverty and the global demand for sources of cheap, expendable labour and credit and the greed of the State to own all money.

UK Bonded labourers are not allowed to smoke, drink, or eat anything that may affect their productivity. they are also now forced to work well into old age to show a good return on "investment" for their masters.

Just this morning, the UK plantation owner added another £300 each to the debt of UK labourers to help out a neighbouring plantation owner who has not been working his labourers hard enough

Is bonded labour new?

No, it has existed for thousands of years. In South Asia it is rooted in the caste system (class system in the UK) and flourishes in agriculture, in cottage industries, the banking sector and in factories and in the West the future labour of your children is traded in "Government Bonds".

Debt bondage was also used as a means of trapping indentured labourers into working on plantations in Africa, the Caribbean and South-East London, following the abolition of the slave trade.

Bonded labourers are forced to work to repay debts their employer or Government says they owe, and they are not allowed to work for anyone else or simply do nothing. Various forms of force are used to make sure they stay. In many cases they are kept under surveillance, sometimes under lock and key. In Britain, if you refuse to hand over your earned money to the Government, you will be placed in jail.

There are extreme examples of chained labourers kept under armed guard in Pakistan. Poverty and threats of violence force many bonded labourers to stay with their masters, since they would not otherwise be able to eat or have a place to sleep, although in Britain, bonded labourers are forced to provide their own housing and food.
Poverty, and Politicians prepared to exploit the desperation of others lie at the heart of bonded labour. Often without land or education, the need for cash just for daily survival forces people to sell their labour in exchange for a lump sum of money, salary or a loan.
Despite the fact that bonded labour is illegal in most countries where it is found, governments are rarely willing to enforce the law, or to ensure that those who profit from it are punished. It is what allows them to thrive and control vast populations. Leaders of the Governments are all multi millionaires."

Article source:-
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/unemployment-figures-moving-in-right-direction-2267089.html

Top 10 Job Areas for 2011:Jobs with salary more than 100000 USD

 

Hot jobs

Editor's Note: Salary ranges for the following positions are derived from sources that include Robert Half Technology's salary guide for 2011, as well as job sites Indeed.com and Simplyhired.com.
   1. Business Continuity: Based on the 2011 Global State of Information Security Survey conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers, business continuity is one of the major factors driving information security spending. The study says that close to 63% of respondents have a business continuity plan in place, but only a marginal percentage of these plans are deemed effective. "What we will see is increased adoption and deployment of a business continuity management program in 2011, as organizations focus on making these effective," Lobel says.

     The emergence of increased threats such as pandemic outbreak, recession, power outages, terrorism and cyber fraud have pushed the need for qualified business continuity professionals in today's marketplace.

      Jobs for business continuity professionals within banking and government will focus on candidates with extensive risk assessment and analysis skills, who can identify potential impacts that threaten an organization and implement an effective enterprise framework.

      Within healthcare, jobs will focus on those professionals who can address the backup and recovery of electronically protected health information (EPHI) and critical business processes, as well as engage in an organizational wide business continuity planning.

      These individuals will need to be proficient in risk monitoring, measuring and mitigating skills. "The check list approach will completely wear out, as tackling of new risks will emerge as a necessity," Lobel says.

      Salary range for a business continuity analyst is $74,500-$106,000.
   2. Business Opportunities: A recent IBM Tech Trends study, which surveyed 2,000 IT professionals including IT security architects, network administrators and application developers across 87 countries, confirms the need for IT security professionals to better understand how business works. A key finding of the study is that nine out of 10 IT professionals believe industry-specific business knowledge is critical even in their technical roles, yet only 63 percent indicate they possess the business knowledge they needed to remain competitive.

      "Security is all about business understanding and value," says David Foote, chief executive officer at Foote Partners, a Florida-based consultancy that tracks IT skills and competencies. It is crucial for security practitioners to understand basic business concepts such as shareholder value, profit margins, cash flow and supplier diversity, says Foote. "This goes a long way in getting a seat at the executive table."

      Companies therefore, are increasingly focusing on soft skills, including presentation abilities, strategic thinking and project management know-how, and they are bringing on board individuals who can make the connections among security, IT risk and business, says John Reed, executive director of Robert Half Technology.

      "Understanding business requirements has become mandatory for integrated security initiatives to succeed at any organization," Reed says.

      Also, there are new and emerging corporate and business-line security jobs in areas of business analysis, intelligence, risk management, governance and integration activities. "The future will demand practitioners to understand their business, how it's governed and its impact within their industry," Foote says.

      Average salary for a business security manager is $82,000.
   3. Risk Management: According to the ISC2 2010 Career Impact Survey, which polled almost 3,000 respondents from 80 countries, there is a high demand for professionals with risk management expertise. About 47% of hiring managers from various sectors worldwide say they are seeking recruits who are well-versed in information risk management. "All of a sudden people are realizing that managing IT security is all about risk," says Hord Tipton, executive director at ISC2. "Organizations are now looking for individuals who can successfully implement security to take risks out of the business."

      A key trend seen by industry experts is a move toward enterprise risk management by organizations specifically within banking and government, as they prepare for unmanaged risk. The ERM programs generally provide for a consolidated view of emerging risks and a framework that focuses on the organization's overall business goals and objectives, the amount of risk the organization can tolerate and what fits within its culture.

      In the coming year, organizations will focus on building more coordinated and robust risk models, requiring professionals to be proficient in integrated risk analysis and assessment to determine where to concentrate resources -- where can they afford to take risks and generate the most value and selectively de-prioritize those areas that do not contribute?

      The jobs for risk professionals within healthcare will focus on understanding IT risk related to patient's right, says Tipton. More organizations will adopt effective risk identification/prevention techniques and methodologies in reducing adverse outcomes and incidents related to medical-malpractice and disclosure of patient's sensitive information. Also, these professionals will be actively involved as organizations transition to electronic health records. It will therefore, be critical for risk professionals to understand compliance requirements such as The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and privacy breach laws.

      Average salary for an IT risk manager is $90,000.
   4. Cloud Computing: Based on the 2010 CIO survey by Gartner Executive Programs, which included responses from 1,586 chief information officers representing 41 countries and 27 industries, a key finding is a transition to collaborative and innovative solutions such as virtualization, cloud computing and Web 2.0 social computing.

      "2011 will see a shift in business expectations from just focusing on cost-based efficiencies to achieving greater results based on enterprise and IT productivity," says Reed. This shift will create the need for new roles within information security that will increasingly specialize in managing, negotiating agreements and deliverables with cloud providers.

      The cloud movement will further enhance focus on industry-specific, business-related processes and lead to more business, privacy, application, risk and security-savvy management professionals. Who can understand how to protect and classify data in the cloud? What encryption methodologies must be deployed? How does one handle privacy requirements and their impact on the company?

      Cloud computing initiatives are high on the government's agenda, as agencies quickly transition to the secure cloud in an effort to increase cost efficiencies. "New jobs with specialized skills including Web 2.0 deployments, virtualization, server consolidation and configuration management will hit the market in 2011," says Tipton.

      However, the current adoption of cloud computing at banks and healthcare organizations is lower, mainly because of security and privacy issues related to data protection in a cloud environment. But as cloud computing initiatives get refined and gain prominence, the years ahead will see a higher adoption rate.

      Also, professionals with experience in service-oriented architecture, storage technologies, web services standards and open source technologies will find themselves very marketable in all sectors.

      Average salary for cloud computing job positions is $102,000.
   5. Application Security:This has been a hot growth area in all industries because of increased focus on customer-facing technologies, use of mobile applications, transition to electronic health records and need for secure software and products.

      In fact, even graduates in information security are finding themselves increasingly hired by online and tech firms such as Google, Apple and Yahoo for IT and security application roles. There has been a sudden spike in application security positions in the last two years, says Jennifer Burkett, director of Career Services & External Relations at Carnegie Mellon University. "We now see a significant percentage of our students filling these roles, requiring innovative thinking and knowledge of Android and mobile applications."

      The ISC2 2010 Career Impact Survey indicates that about 42% of hiring managers will seek expertise in application and system developmental security.

      As organizations realize that a high percentage of attacks and fraud are focused on the application layer, they are increasingly focused on implementing secure software development lifecycle, says Tipton.

      Within the government, specific skills in application security such as Web 2.0 and SOA for Web services, enterprise resource planning, database skills including-SQL Server and IBM Db2, will be in demand. Specifically in banking, the focus areas include identity management, secure products and access control.

      Within healthcare, application jobs will be more focused on understanding "how security attacks manifest themselves in the application and emphasize in analyzing the typical patterns and tracks to prevent breaches," says Tipton.

      Overall, 2011 will see a growing demand for qualified security programmers, web application developers, software engineers and security architects.

      Salary range for an application developer is $85,000-$117,500.
   6. Forensics: Digital forensics is growing in importance as companies work to comply with federal and state regulations affecting many industries, including banking and healthcare, that require organizations to be able to quantify how much customer information was exposed during the course of a breach. These investigations frequently require the application of digital forensics, such as to analyze the impact of malware.

      Also, as cyber attacks increase and become more sophisticated, no organization is immune to targeted, persistent attacks, and therefore they need to prepare and invest in professionals to perform incident response and digital forensics activities to understand what happened, what was the damage and analyze the extent of the attack, says Rob Lee, director and IT forensics expert at Mandiant, a Washington-based information security software and services firm.

      2011 will see an increase in jobs requiring forensics expertise for positions including information security crime investigator, forensics analyst, incident responder and litigation support specialists in all three sectors. "The on-demand skills will need professionals to specialize in firewalls, hacking or mobile devices," Lee says.

      Average salary for a forensics professional is $81,000.
   7. Network Security: Of the 100 jobs that make Money magazine's and Payscale.com's list, network security is ranked number eight as one of the most desirable job positions, carrying a 10-year forecast growth of 27%.

      "The ongoing cyber attacks and online crime are driving a huge need for experts who can proactively protect critical infrastructure," says Sliver. " We are seeing an increase in job postings for professionals who are offensively attacking malware for instance even before they hit the networks."

      An increased demand for these professionals is coming from government agencies such as the National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Homeland Security and the Defense Department, which are all seeking entry-to-mid level, qualified professionals to design, implement, maintain and troubleshoot their network/security infrastructure, servers and workstations. In addition, Burkett also sees an increase in scholarship funding by defense contractors like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, who are directly recruiting IT security graduates for these positions.

      Within the healthcare sector, demand for network security practitioners is gradually increasing as organizations get aggressive in implementing IT security measures to secure their networks and maintain compliance with critical regulations such as HIPAA.

      Average salary for a network security engineer is $75,000.
   8. Regulatory Compliance: Reed finds a big emphasis on compliance and regulatory requirements from employers while hiring IT security professionals specifically in the banking and healthcare sectors, which are so heavily regulated. He says that he often finds understanding of industry regulations including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, as mandatory for positions dealing with data privacy, vendor management, as well as governance, risk and compliance activities.

      "Compliance is driving the need for security and protection in these industries," he says, as new compliance emerges within mobile applications and technologies such as virtualization and cloud computing. Going forward, there will be a need for a new breed of security professionals "who can draw a balance between the reality of compliance requirements and the appropriate risk decisions they will participate in."

      Average salary for a compliance officer is $77,000.
   9. Wireless Security: Managed wireless security services, including mobile wireless, is a hot area for 2011, says Foote. "We are seeing compound annual growth rate projections through 2014 as high as 27% for wireless segments within managed securities services." Looking at the wireless security market, Foote says, "It's a (US) $9 billion market in Europe, a $5.7 billion market in Asia-Pacific and between $4 and $5 billion in North America."

      Within this area, Foote sees demand for professionals with specific skills including VOIP security, vulnerability scanning, threat assessment, incident management, data leak prevention, secure code development, intrusion detection and prevention and IP based services.

      Salary range for a wireless network engineer is $74,750-$102,500.
  10. Security Leadership: is increasingly a business focus and demands leadership skills in 2011 that are centered toward achieving the strategic needs of an organization. "Leaders within security are moving from just battling incidents and regulations to becoming revenue orientated, with 'can do' attitudes," says Lobel. Their role is becoming more intertwined with high-level organizational risks, and in the more regulated and mature industries, the security leader is getting engaged in managing business processes residing on IT systems such as SAP or other ERP, and in addition is looking at IT risk beyond the conventional thinking around the Confidentiality, Integrity & Availability triad.

      In 2011, leaders will need to drive change in their organizations and not simply respond to it," Lobel says. They will need to identify new technologies (cloud, mobile applications and social media) and how those technologies can increase or protect market share or revenues. For instance, if an organization is looking to migrate into the cloud rather than trying to stop the business from using new technology, leaders will need to have their plans in place before the business decides they need this migration.

      Salary range for a chief security officer is $110,750-$165,750.

Article Source:-

 http://www.healthcareinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=3145

Where are the Grownups?

When it comes to economic policy, the grownups among politicians in Washington DC have gone missing. (Brad Delong clearly needs to resume his occasional series, "Grownup Republican Watch".) And in today's world where uninformed, discredited, and illogical economic policies seem to be eagerly accepted as gospel by legislators, the grownups have gone quiet on both sides of the aisle:

Debt ceiling: More Democrats threaten to vote against raising borrowing limit

A growing number of Democrats are threatening to defy the White House over the national debt, joining Republican calls for deficit cuts as a requirement for consenting to lift the country’s borrowing limit.

The tension is the latest illustration of how the tea-party-infused GOP is driving the debate in Washington over federal spending.

So the dangerous game in which the possibility of US government default is a bargaining chip does not seem to be over, and in fact seems to be getting new players.

And then there's the real and destructive impact of the growing threats against the Fed's independence.

Thinking more about how effective those threats from inflationistas in Washington have been in shaping current monetary policy, I came across this piece from last fall by Kenneth Silber (at David Frum's website):

The Fed and The GOP Weren’t Always Enemies

The Fed chairman was testifying before the House banking committee. When he explained the central bank’s planned course of action, the members reacted with fury. Rep. Frank Annunzio (D-Ill.) shouted: “Your course of action is wrong.” Rep. George Hansen (R-Idaho) railed that the Fed was “destroying middle America.” Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Texas) called for the chairman’s impeachment.

That was in July 1981. The Fed chairman was Paul Volcker and the course of action the members were decrying was a further tightening of monetary policy. As the economy fell into recession, public outrage toward the Fed grew. Volcker’s mail included bricks from contractors to symbolize the houses they couldn’t build, and keys from car dealers for cars they couldn’t sell.

Yet the Fed stuck to its guns and ultimately won widespread plaudits for taming inflation. An underappreciated aspect of this episode is that President Ronald Reagan not only refrained from jumping on the anti-Fed bandwagon but also defended the institution and its independent role in making monetary policy. “This administration will always support the political independence of the Federal Reserve Board,” he said in a February 1982 press conference in the midst of recession.

As in so many policy arenas, the grownups in the Repuiblican party used to be willing to speak up. But not today. As a result, the US's monetary policy is being influenced by extreme political rhetoric and bizaare economic theories to a worrying degree.

Okay, I admit it: when fringe elements in Washington (mainly on the right, but partly on the left as well) began making noise about reducing the Fed's independence over the past year or two, I discounted it. Given how important central bank independence is to long-run monetary policy, and given how difficult it is to regain such independence once it is lost, I never thought that such yapping would ever be allowed to have any significant impact on how the US conducts its monetary policy.

But I now think I was wrong. I now think that the current threats to the Fed's independence may be a serious danger to the long-term economic prospects of the US economy -- certainly a far more serious danger than any government budget deficit you care to imagine. I now think that Ron Paul and his supporters actually have more power, and are more dangerous, than I ever could have imagined possible.

And where are the Fed's defenders? Sure, plenty of economists have gone on the record affirming the importance of keeping the Fed insulated from political pressure. But where are the politicians who are willing to do the same? And why are so many elected officials today willing to risk serious and possibly irrevocable damage to the US economy, whether it be by threatening to force the US government to default or by threatening to curb the Fed's independence? Where are the grownups?

And You Thought You Had A Bad Day!





Click to Enlarge

938,000 Applicants Turned Away From Employment At McDonalds

My God, what has become of the once great and mighty nation?

McDonald's released a statement today in which it announced that it has hired 62,000 workers recently on their April 19th hiring day. What is the most disturbing piece of information in the press release is that McDonald's received a total of 1 million applications in all.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is what our economy has been reduced to. One million out of work Americans all fighting for the right to don the golden arches uniform and sling burgers and fries. After going to the McDonald web site I found out that they are offering a starting salary of $7.25 an hour. Given that the majority of these 62,000 positions filled were probably part-time, each of the lucky recipients of one of these jobs can look forward to a gross paycheck of $150.00 per week.

from Bloomberg:

McDonald’s Corp. (MCD), the world’s biggest restaurant chain, said it hired 24 percent more people than planned during an employment event this month.

McDonald’s and its franchisees hired 62,000 people in the U.S. after receiving more than one million applications, the Oak Brook, Illinois-based company said today in an e-mailed statement. Previously, it said it planned to hire 50,000.

The April 19 national hiring day was the company’s first, said Danya Proud, a McDonald’s spokeswoman. She declined to disclose how many of the jobs were full- versus part-time. McDonald’s employed 400,000 workers worldwide at company-owned stores at the end of 2010, according to a company filing.

New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 28, 2011

Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.

Check out the document released by WhiteHouse.gov for yourself.



Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.

When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.

VIDEO: Alex Jones gives proof that Obama’s purported birth certificate is fraud.


Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.

There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.

The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writes Joe Brooks for Wireupdate.

Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.

Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.

These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.

<< /Length 17 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 123 /Height 228 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >> << /Length 13 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 199 /Height 778 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 19 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 47 /Height 216 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 15 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 42 /Height 274 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 10 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 1454 /Height 1819
/ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 25 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 132 /Height 142 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 23 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 243 /Height 217 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 21 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 34 /Height 70 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the “date accepted” boxes, as well as the “Mother’s occupation box.” Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.

Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obama’s document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of “Aug.” for the date rather than “August,” and the use of “Honolulu, Oahu” rather than “Honolulu, Hawaii” (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.

More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.

Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.



Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.


Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.


http://www.infowars.com/new-obama-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/